Movie Review: The Adjustment Bureau

I will be leaving the state for a few days on a photo sojourn, so the next two days of journal entries have been written and will publish automatically at 8 am on Thursday and Friday. I will not be sending out email copies of those entries until at least Sunday night, but more likely Monday morning. If you are an email subscriber and can’t wait, I suggest you go to the website on those days shortly after 8 am.

I will be Tweeting (probably not a ton, but some) on my photo sojourn, so if you are bored with your life and want to see what I’m doing on this trip, you can follow my Twitter feed:

http://www.twitter.com/photography139

This trip would have been a prime opportunity to play with Foursquare, but I don’t think I have time to set up an account and figure that stuff out.

Regardless, I won’t be responding to many emails, texts or phone calls in the next 4 days.

MovieThe Adjustment Bureau

Director: George Nolfi (Directorial Debut)
Writer: Geoge Nolfi (The Bourne Ultimatum, Ocean’s Twelve, The Sentinel)
Staring: Matt Damon (Good Will Hunting, The Departed, The Bourne Ultimatum) and Emily Blunt (The Devil Wears Prada, The Young Victoria, Sunshine Cleaning)

Theater – Cinemark Movies 12 – Ames, Iowa

Companion – Nader

Food – Mongolian Buffet

Intellectual Honesty

I am a big fan of Matt Damon. I have been ever since Good Will Hunting. I also favor Emily Blunt. I’ve liked her ever since The Devil Wears Prada.

Baggage

I was intrigued by this movie, but the fact that Hollywood dumps most of its disappointing movies in the early part of the year was a concern. Also, it looked like it might have been a ripoff of Inception. Source Code also looks like a ripoff of Inception.

Synopsis from IMDB

Do we control our destiny, or do unseen forces manipulate us? Matt Damon stars in the thriller The Adjustment Bureau as a man who glimpses the future Fate has planned for him and realizes he wants something else. To get it, he must pursue the only woman he’s ever loved across, under and through the streets of modern-day New York. On the brink of winning a seat in the U.S. Senate, ambitious politician David Norris (Damon) meets beautiful contemporary ballet dancer Elise Sellas (Emily Blunt)-a woman like none he’s ever known. But just as he realizes he’s falling for her, mysterious men conspire to keep the two apart. David learns he is up against the agents of Fate itself-the men of The Adjustment Bureau-who will do everything in their considerable power to prevent David and Elise from being together. In the face of overwhelming odds, he must either let her go and accept a predetermined path…

Review

I loved the beginning of this movie. I legitimately like Matt Damon and Emily Blunt enough that I would have been quite content for a straight romance movie. The conflict of running a high profile campaign for the Senate and dating somebody like Blunt’s Elise would have been more than enough conflict to make an interesting movie.

David and Elise meet in a bathroom while David is practicing his concession speech after losing his bid for the U.S. Senate because a picture of him participating in a prank at a college reunion shows up on the front pages of the NYC newspapers. His brief interaction with Elise causes him to not give the speech that was written for him.

The speech he gives is the 2nd best scene in the movie and it is the speech that I badly wish that some politician (any politician) would give in the United States.

He starts out giving the speech with a story about a rule from his own neighborhood. It wasn’t whether or not you got knocked down, but it was what you did when you got back up that mattered.

After he delivers the line he stops. Then he tells a story about a magazine article about him revealed that the number one thing that drew other people to him was that he was “authentic”. However, he didn’t feel authentic.

He then tells the truth. That wasn’t a rule in his old neighborhood. It was a line that tested well to focus groups. He didn’t pick out his tie. A consulting firm that his campaign had paid decided that he should wear red and blue ties. Then he takes off his shoe and holds it up. His campaign paid a consulting firm 7300 dollars to decide what was the correct amount of scuffing to have on his shoes. Too little scuffing makes him look like a lawyer or an investment banker and that would limit his appeal to the working class. Too much scuff on his shoes would damage his appeal to lawyers and investment bankers.

I loved this scene because it is sadly true. I was almost as excited to vote for David Norris after his speech as I was for Barack Obama, and he isn’t even real!

It was one of the best movie political speeches I’ve ever seen. It ranks right up there with the speeches from The Candidate.

The speech reminded me of Ronald Reagan a little bit. Love or hate Ronald Reagan, if you want, but I respect Ronald Reagan. The real Ronald Reagan, not the one that the Republican party has tried to make him into. The Ronald Reagan that raised taxes 11 times, granted amnesty for illegal immigrants, and signed an arms reduction treaty with the Soviet Union.

I don’t know how true this story is, but I once heard this story about Ronald Reagan and it is a large part of the reason why I respect the real Ronald Reagan.

He was having a meeting on an issue and one of his advisers brought up polling data and how certain decisions would effect his approval ratings. He told his adviser to stop. He didn’t want to know how his decision would effect his popularity. He wanted to know what decision he could make that was best for the country.

But I digress…

It is a month after this speech when David runs into Elise on a bus that the Adjustment Bureau steps into their life and tries to stop their romance from blossoming. David is told that he is never to see Elise again and that if he tells anybody about the existence of the Adjustment Bureau they will erase his brain.

It is what the Adjustment Bureau is that is probably the weakest part of the movie. The script seems to want to be very bland about who these people are and they definitely aren’t affiliated with any religion. They exist and they work for The Chairman who writes “the plan”.

This raises a large amount of issues of predestination versus free will. I come down fairly strong on the side of free will. So much so that, if I didn’t believe in free will I would view life as a completely fruitless exercise in futility. However, the movie tries to play it both ways.

Apparently these “case workers” intervened in human history from our “hunters and gatherers” stage on through the Roman Empire. Then, humans were allowed to make their own choices, but we screwed it up and that lead to the Dark Ages. This caused them to intervene again, but they stopped intervening in 1910. But had to start intervening again because we were going to blow ourselves up during the Cuban Missile Crisis.

However, humans can try to make their own decisions but if it messes with the Plan, then the Adjustment Bureau adjusts your decisions to get you back on the plan.

David doesn’t give up on his dream of Elise and years later “chance” throws them together for a third time. This leads to what I consider the best scene in the movie where David tells Elise the full story of why he got into politics. It is a story about how he was bottoming out after his mom and brother died a month apart when he was a teenager. The scene ends with what I personally consider some of the most magical words in the English language: “I’ve never told anybody that before.”

For the record, that is considerably different than “don’t tell anybody else this.”

The Adjustment Bureau tries again to break them up using tactics that do raise interesting moral questions.

“Would you stay with the person you loved if you knew it was going to be bad for you?”

I think that is a very easy question to answer, but the next question is much harder to answer:

“Would you stay with the person you loved if you knew it was going to be bad for them?”

Even though I think the movie ducked some questions and its history of the world interpretation is very spotty at best, I did enjoy this movie. In fact, when I initially left the theater I left thinking it was just kind of average. But the more I think about it, the more I like the movie. Yes I found the ending a little frustrating and the mechanics of the Adjustment Bureau a little lame, but everything else more than countered my qualms.

Rating
3.5/5.0 Caramels

Buy on DVD
Yes I will.

2011 Ranking
Currently number one. Although admittedly the competition hasn’t been too stiff.

Bonus Information

There was a preview for the movie The Conspirator that looks really interesting.

Up Next
Most likely Cedar Rapids. For real this time.

The Archives: Edition Seven

These pictures come from: backup/Old My Pictures/County Farm

I want to give a small amount of background on these pictures. These pictures were taken at the Boone County Farm after it was abandoned and before it was demolished.

If you know me at all, you know that one of my favorite shows is Ghost Adventures. Some people would describe my love for that show as a guilty pleasure. I would not because I’m not the slightest bit guilty about it.

I love this show and I hate every other single ghost show on television. I don’t even like ghost movies.

I don’t even believe in ghosts. I would my consider myself open to the possibility that ghosts exist, but I don’t believe they exist.

I could be classified as a paranormal agnostic, I want to believe in ghosts (and I don’t eliminate the possibility that they exist), but I just don’t.

The Boone County Farm was reputed to be haunted. Carla and I have always shared an interest in the paranormal. So when the Boone County Farm went on the real estate market, we collected Jay and went to tour the allegedly haunted building.

This is the closest I have been to a Ghost Adventures type trip.

Perhaps because it was the middle of the day, or perhaps because I am skeptical, I did not experience or witness any paranormal activity. However, IF a place was to be haunted by negative residual energy, I do believe that the Boone County Farm would be the type of place that it could happen.

Since most people think the word “poorhouse” isn’t a reference to something that actually existed or know what a County Farm was, I’m providing a little bit of background information on such things.

From http://www.poorhousestory.com/:

Poorhouses were tax-supported residential institutions to which people were required to go if they could not support themselves. They were started as a method of providing a less expensive (to the taxpayers) alternative to what we would now days call “welfare” – what was called “outdoor relief” in those days. People requested help from the community Overseer of the Poor ( sometimes also called a Poor Master) – an elected town official. If the need was great or likely to be long-term, they were sent to the poorhouse instead of being given relief while they continued to live independently. Sometimes they were sent there even if they had not requested help from the Overseer of the Poor. That was usually done when they were found guilty of begging in public, etc.

[One misconception should be cleared up here; they were not technically “debtors’ prisons.” Someone could owe a great deal of money, but if they could still provide themselves with the necessities for remaining independent they might avoid the poorhouse.]

During the second quarter of the 19th century, as the industrial revolution had its effect on the United States, the importation of the factory system from England was followed almost immediately by the full scale adoption of what seemed to be an inherent component of that system — the Poorhouse System. These poorhouses were built with great optimism. They promised to be a much more efficient and cheaper way to provide relief to paupers. And there was a fervent popular belief that housing such people in institutions would provide the opportunity to reform them and cure them of the bad habits and character defects that were assumed to be the cause of their poverty.

By mid-century, people were beginning to question the success of the poorhouse movement. Investigations were launched to examine the conditions in poorhouses. They had proven to be much more expensive than had been anticipated. And they had not significantly reduced the numbers of the “unworthy poor” nor eliminated the need for “outdoor relief”. [ This was public assistance given to those living outside the poorhouses. It was given somewhat grudgingly to those considered to be (perhaps!) more “worthy” poor –who might only briefly and temporarily require assistance to procure food or fuel or clothing when they fell on very short-term hard times.]

By 1875, after the regulation of poorhouses in most states became the responsibility of the State Board of Charities, laws were passed prohibiting children from residing in poorhouses and removing mentally ill patients and others with special needs to more appropriate facilities.

The poorhouse population was even more narrowly defined during the twentieth century when social welfare legislation (Workman’s Compensation, Unemployment benefits and Social Security) began to provide a rudimentary “safety net” for people who would previously have been pauperized by such circumstances. Eventually the poorhouses evolved almost exclusively into nursing homes for dependent elderly people. But poorhouses left orphanages, general hospitals and mental hospitals — for which they had provided the prototype — as their heritage.

The Boone County Farm was tormented by not 1, but 2 tragic fires.

From http://www.respectourdead.com/:

January 1894

EIGHT PERSONS CREMATED

A Sickening Tragedy

The Disaster at the County Insane Asylum.

The most horrible tragedy that ever occurred in the limits of Boone county took place Tuesday night of last week when the county insane asylum burned down. Of the nine inmates of the place eight were burned to death, roasted alive, meeting a fate that makes one shudder. The horrible death roll, which has been published all over the country and created a cry of indignation wherever read is as follows:

ANDERSON, CHRISTIANA, aged 28
SNIGGS, JOHANNA, aged 55
CRAIG, JOSEPH, aged 81
LESSER, THOMAS aged 45
PETERSON, CHRISTIAN, aged 87
SCOTT, SARAH aged 82
SODERBURG, ANNA, aged 38
TUCKER, Mercy, aged 48

The county insane asylum was located on the poor farm. The poor farm is on the old Fort Dodge road seven miles directly north of Boone and a mile and a half south of Mineral Ridge. Henry Holcomb is steward of the poor farm and had charge of the insane also. The insane asylum was a two-story frame building put up about 60 feet from the poor house proper It was erected six or eight years ago, when Boone county took charge of its incurable insane, taking care of them at home instead of the state institutions. This was originally done because there was not room in the state institutions and the counties were required to take care of the harmless incurables as best they could. Of late years, since the state facilities have been increased, the county has kept up the local asylum as a matter of economy.

There were nine of these unfortunates in the asylum–the eight that lost their lives and one that escaped, Mrs. Hibbart. Tuesday night, January 23, was one of the worst nights this winter. A furious storm started in the afternoon which gained in fury all night. The thermometer went down to 30 degrees below zero before morning. The insane asylum was heated with a furnace in the cellar which was reported out of order. Regardless of this, the nine unfortunates who were not of sufficiently sound mind to take care of themselves were locked up in this fire trap to perish like so many rats. Possibly the doors were not locked, but the unfortunate creatures, unable to look out for themselves, were left alone without a person of sound mind to look after them. When the house was left we have not learned. Evidently the old furnace was fired up so that the inmates should not freeze to death that bitter cold night and then left to their fate.

Henry Holcomb, the steward, went to bed at his usual time and all the inmates of the poor house proper were asleep at ten o’clock when they were awakened by Mrs. Hibbart coming into the house and telling them the madhouse was on fire. Holcomb rushed to the burning building, which he saw was all aflame inside, and burst in the door. He could not enter and no sound except the crackling of flames was heard. The poor unfortunates were already dead, either suffocated before they awoke, or lacking the intelligence to make their escape.

Four of the poor creatures that were not considered perfectly safe were locked in their cells at night, and could not have escaped if they would. The others could have gotten out if intelligent enough. What little help there was availed nothing against the fire, and all that could be done was to prevent its spreading to the poorhouse and other buildings of the poor farm. The tragedy was over in half an hour and the roof fell in. The victims were seen burned beyond recognition. From the places where some of the remains were found it is inferred that some of the unfortunates had reached the windows and tried to escape from them.

How the fire originated is not and never will be known. One of the insane women was in the habit of tearing her clothes to shreds and stuffing them into the hot air registers. It is possible that this may have been the cause of the fire. The grand jury visited the asylum last week and their report, published in the last issue of THE DEMOCRAT, was far from complimentary to the institution. Before it was read by many of the readers of this paper news of the sickening tragedy was on the streets.

A great moral responsibility attaches to some one for this crime against humanity. We will not stop to discuss how the policy of keeping the insane at home instead of in state institutions. It is sufficient that they were kept on the poor farm. Why were they not cared for? Who is to blame for the shocking barbarity of leaving nine unfortunate human beings unable to take care of themselves alone in a building to perish like so many rats? To burn up at 10 o’clock, the early part of the evening. It is highly probable that the fire had been smoldering for some time before it burst out. A sane person might likely have smelled fire and investigated before retiring. Possibly lives might have been lost even if proper precaution had been taken. This has occurred in other asylum fires. But then there would have been no cause for the universal indignation that is expressed at the utter lack of care in looking out for the unfortunates in Boone county. If economy was the reason the purpose has been accomplished–the insane are burned up and will no longer cost the county anything. This is cheaper than hiring some one to take charge of them but arouses a cry of indignation from every corner of the land. We wish the man or men that are responsible for leaving these unfortunates alone with less care than is given so many cattle (for fires are carefully kept out of the stable) could see the comments that are being made all over the country in the press. It will not mend matters but may cause a little remorse. Locking the stable door after the horse is stolen is of little use.

The criminal carelessness is largely chargeable upon the board of supervisors for the method of taking care of the insane. We do not wish to single out the present board, for they probably did the same as has been done for years, but the whole method is wrong. The management of the poor farm is peddled out to the lowest bidder, the man that will do it the cheapest, regardless of fitness for the place. It is possible that the present steward of the poor farm, who left nine people that the proper tribunal said were not competent to take care of themselves alone to perish did just what his predecessors had done before him. That does not make it less reprehensible. The tragedy is a blot on Boone county that can never be justified and must meet the condemnation of every humane man.

A second tragic fire occurred in March of 1917:

Boone Mar.8 – One aged woman and three men, all inmates of the Boone county poor house, eight miles north of here burned to death in a fire which destroyed the three story brick structure at 10 o’clock last night. Fifty-six other inmates narrowly escaped in their night clothes.

There was no fire protection at the institution and the Boone fire department was not called. Superintendent Heedwell of the poor farm aided by employees succeeded in getting out to safety all except four aged persons on the third floor who lost their lives.

The fire is believed to have started either in the boiler room or from defective wiring between floors.

The dead are Mrs. Oberg, D. Decker, 86, John Allen 86; and Peter Peterson 23. Mrs. Oberg was safely out of the building once but apparently lost her head an rushed back into the structure. She was never seen again until her charred body was found today.

Here are the pictures:


IMAGES LOST

Shortly after we made this trip, the County Farm was torn down and buried on the site where it once stood.

I do have a Ghost Adventures type trip scheduled tentatively for April to the Villisca Axe Murder House. I’m sure I’ll come back with better pictures from that trip.

Next week’s folder is: backup/Old My Pictures/Cruise Vacation – 2004 – December

RWPE Y2 #9 – Silhouette

It is a bit disappointing how unpopular SILHOUETTE ended up being. It is perhaps the easiest artistic theme of the bunch. Oh well… here are the submissions for SILHOUETTE.


WEEK 9 - SILHOUETTE - MIKE VEST
Mike Vest of Waxen Media

WEEK 9 - SILHOUETTE - CHRISTOPHER D. BENNETT
Christopher D. Bennett

I’ve visited the Random Theme Generator and asked it kindly to spit out an inspiration theme for this week. This is what it said to me:

STILL LIFE

A good definition of STILL LIFE photography comes from Wikipedia:

Still life photography is the depiction of inanimate subject matter, most typically a small grouping of objects. Still life photography, more so than other types of photography, such as landscape or portraiture, gives the photographer more leeway in the arrangement of design elements within a composition. The still life photographer makes pictures rather than takes them.

Click the link below to see last year’s STILL LIFE submissions:

2010 STILL LIFE

Hopefully more people have enough still in their life to submit pictures this coming week.

As always, submissions are due to bennett@photography139.com by noon on Monday.

As always there is only one rule: photo must be taken during the week of the theme.

Personal Photo Project of the Week #57


9 Emotions Project - Sara Junck
Sara – 9 Emotions

Sara was the 2nd person to pose for this project. A reminder, the 9 emotions from left to right – top to bottom:

1. Joy
2. Sadness
3. Anger
4. Amusement
5. Fear
6. Jealousy
7. Surprise
8. Sympathy
9. Boredom

A closer look at Sara and the 9 emotions:


Sara - Joy
Joy

Sara - Sadness
Sadness

Sara - Anger
Anger

Sara - Amusement
Amusement

Sara - Fear
Fear

Sara - Jealousy
Jealousy

Sara - Surprise
Surprise

Sara - Sympathy
Sympathy

Sara - Boredom
Boredom

I have completed the photos of all 9 people, but I realize now that at this rate of publishing, they won’t all get published until May, so after this week I will start publishing in pairs.

Next week’s Personal Photo Project will hopefully involve film again. I bought a toy pinhole camera several months back and I’m just waiting to get the roll of film back from the developers.

Since I’ve never used this camera before, that roll of film would best be described as experimental, therefore I just hope that something even turns out at all.

If not, next week I’ll publish the 9 Emotions pictures for Jen and Derrick.

Movie Review: Hall Pass

EDITOR’S NOTE: SINCE THE ORIGINAL PUBLICATION OF THIS BLOG IT HAS COME TO MY ATTENTION THAT MONICA AND JEFF WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DELICIOUS FRUIT PIZZA. MY APOLOGIES FOR GIVING THE CREDIT TO DERRICK.
MovieHall Pass

Director: Bobby and Peter Farrelly (Dumb & Dumber, Kingpin, There’s Something About Mary)
Writer: Pete Jones, Peter Farrelly, Kevin Barnett, Bobby Farrelly
Starring: Owen Wilson (Wedding Crashers, The Royal Tenenbaums, Marley & Me), Jason Sudeikis (Going the Distance, What Happens in Vegas), Jenna Fischer (The Office, Blades of Glory, Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story), Christina Applegate (Anchorman, Don’t Tell Mom the Babysitter’s Dead, Married with Children)

Theater – Cinemark Movies 12 – Ames, Iowa

Companion – Nader

Food – Okoboji Grill

Intellectual Honesty

I like Jenna Fischer. I thought that the trailer looked funny.

Baggage

Owen Wilson is pretty much always terrible unless he is in a Wes Anderson movie. The Farrelly brothers movies have been pretty blah since There’s Something About Mary.

Synopsis from IMDB

A married man is granted the opportunity to have an affair by his wife. Joined in the fun by his best pal, things get a little out of control when both wives start engaging in extramarital activities as well.

Review

Let’s face it, there really isn’t much to say about this movie. If you take out the Kathy Griffin jokes at the end of the movie, almost all the funniest parts are in the trailer.

Save the money and the time and watch the trailer.

Rating
1.5/5.0 Caramels

Buy on DVD
Nope.

2011 Ranking
I’ve seen two 2011 movies. It is the 2nd best. The other one I saw (The Dilemna) was nothing special either.

Bonus Information
I saw previews for several movies. They all look terrible. Thor. Cowboys & Aliens. The Hangover Part II. I wonder if Hollywood is even trying this year.

I got an email from Russell referring to me as Movie Man and asking kindly if he could get my opinions on the Oscars or if he would have to wait for a journal entry.

Since most people don’t possess the bravery of Russell, I’ll just paraphrase the email I sent to him about my Oscar experience.

I can’t complain about most categories besides Best Picture and Best Director.

Some of the people I was rooting for didn’t win (Michelle Williams and James Franco), but I can’t really argue with giving the Oscar to Natalie Portman and Colin Firth.

I was sad to see Randy Newman get an Oscar, but this was a pretty weak year for Original Song.

I prefer How to Train Your Dragon over Toy Story 3, but I knew that was a lost cause.

The King’s Speech is kind of a glorified made for TV movie with two exceptional performances.

It is a good movie, but not the best movie of the year. That was clearly The Social Network, but what I think happened is that the older members of the Academy just didn’t get The Social Network and they swung the vote for the much safer The King’s Speech.

Because of the type of movie he makes, I hope this wasn’t David Fincher’s last chance at an Oscar. But if it was, he’ll be in good company. Alfred Hitchcock and Stanley Kubrick and Orson Welles never won an Oscar (for director). However, one Alfred Hitchcock movie did win Best Picture. Rebecca if you really must know.

I was glad that The Kids are All Right didn’t win anything, but now I’m also having to re-watch it to figure out if I think the daughter in the movie is a lesbian or not. I was glad that Jeff Bridges didn’t win. Mumbling is not acting.

I would have been happy to see Amy Adams win, but I freely confess that Melissa Leo was better than her.

The Oscar Party I attended was successful and I had lots and lots of very tasty food. Derrick made some kind of shrimp and cream cheese dip kind of thing that was phenomenal. Plus he made fruit pizza, which is one of my all-time favorite foods. Plus Derrick also made a mean batch of little smokies. There was soup there as well, but I forgot to sample its undoubtable goodness.

I got to give Nader a ride in Jill’s Solstice and this seemed to be one of the biggest thrills of his life, so that was a bonus as well.

I don’t know that I really have an opinion on any of the speeches because truthfully I didn’t really pay much attention to any of them.

Everybody at the gathering seemed to agree that Kirk Douglas’ presentation was painful to sit through. I love you Spartacus, but that was almost as bad as watching Dick Clark on New Year’s.

I don’t have much of an opinion on the hosts. They weren’t so terrible that I noticed them, but they weren’t so funny that I’m dying to have them back. Jay seemed to like them. He said it was the best Oscars he had ever seen. I definitely wouldn’t go that far.

As far as fashion goes, I don’t really have opinions on fashion. So I will relay to you what the fashion expert Jill liked. She liked some of Anne Hathaway’s outfits. I can’t really remember which ones. She didn’t like the Black Swan looking one or the one blue one that looked like it was made of vinyl or the one that she was wearing at the end that made her look borderline naked. She did like Amy Adams’ bluish-sparkly dress. That is all I can recall of fashion conversations.

On an unrelated fashion note, Evie wore pajamas with guitars on them. They were clearly the fashion hit of the evening.

We also watched a little bit of Freakonomics afterward. I wanted Jen to watch it so I could show her the part on whether or not what you name your children has any effect on whether or not they are successful in life. It reminded me of her job.

More Bonus Information

I’ve been messing around with the website and I have added a few little dodads that you should checkout. For example all the pages except the home page have sidebars now. I’m still tinkering with the sidebars, but they currently include links to the last 5 Journal entries and the last 5 pictures I’ve uploaded to the Artistic Gallery. The header now changes as well. Although at this time, there are only two headers. There will be more in the future. I’ve also widened the website so that it looks better on widescreen monitors. I’ve also changed the menu system, but you probably won’t notice any changes in that respect. I’m sure I’m not done tinkering, but those are the recent changes.

RWPE Y2 #8 – Market

Not many submissions for MARKET. I have to confess that MARKET was one of the themes that was under consideration for termination. In the end we kept it because my MARKET picture from last year might have been my favorite RWPE picture from last year.

Here are this year’s submissions for MARKET:


WEEK 8 - MARKET - MIKE VEST
Mike Vest

IMAGE LOST
Julie Johnson

WEEK 8 - MARKET - CHRISTOPHER D. BENNETT
Christopher D. Bennett

I’ve been down to visit the Random Theme Generator and I asked him for a category that would really spark the creative interest of many, many people. This is what it spat at me:

Silhouette

One of my favorite themes.

A look back at the submissions in 2010:

2010 Silhouette

I hope for many submissions next week as this is one of the easiest artistic themes.

Oscar Preview

I thought it wouldn’t hurt to give some predictions on tonight’s Academy Awards. At least the categories that I think I can write semi-competently about.

Adapted Screenplay

The nominees are…

  • 127 Hours
  • The Social Network
  • Toy Story 3
  • True Grit
  • Winter’s Bone

I have seen all 5 of these movies and read none of the source material.

I want to win: The Social Network.  This is the most brilliant script of the year.  Adapted or otherwise.

I think will win: The Social Network. I repeat, the most brilliant script of the year.

Original Screenplay

The nominees are…

  • Another Year
  • The Fighter
  • Inception
  • The Kids Are All Right
  • The King’s Speech

I have seen all the nominees except for Another Year.

I want to win: The Fighter.  Although Inception is my favorite of the nominees, The Fighter brings to life better characters.  Although the script isn’t without its flaws.

I think will win: The King’s Speech. Even though it isn’t one of my favorite movies from this year, it is a solid script that centers around 2 very interesting characters.

Documentary Feature

The nominees are…

  • Exit through the Gift Shop
  • Gasland
  • Inside Job
  • Restrepo
  • Waste Land

I have not seen Inside Job or Waste Land.

I want to win: Gasland. Flammable water. That is all I need to say.

I think will win: Restrepo. War documentaries seem to do well in this category and this is well-done.

Animated Feature

The nominees are…

  • How to Train Your Dragon
  • The Illusionist
  • Toy Story 3

I have seen all 3 nominees.

I want to win: How to Train Your Dragon. I think this movie is the funniest and best of the 3. I admit to being partial to dragon movies.

I think will win: Toy Story 3. They might as well just retire this category and give the award to Pixar every year. Toy Story 3 is nominated for Best Picture and the other 2 are not.

Supporting Actress

The nominees are…

  • Amy Adams in The Fighter
  • Helena Bonham Carter in The King’s Speech
  • Melissa Leo in The Fighter
  • Hailee Steinfeld in True Grit
  • Jacki Weaver in Animal Kingdom

I have seen 4 of 5 nominees. I have not seen Animal Kingdom.

I want to win: Melissa Leo. That is hard for me to say, since I think everybody knows my favorite actress is Amy Adams, but I have to confess that Melissa Leo is even better than her in this movie.

I think will win: Melissa Leo. Although there is potential to split The Fighter votes, I still think Leo will win. It still annoys me that Hailee Steinfeld is in the Supporting Actress category, when she clearly should be nominated for Best Actress.

Supporting Actor

The nominees are…

  • Christian Bale in The Fighter
  • John Hawkes in Winter’s Bone
  • Jeremy Renner in The Town
  • Mark Ruffalo – The Kids Are All Right
  • Geoffrey Rush in The King’s Speech

I have seen all 5 nominees.

I want to win: Christian Bale. Even though I want to hate Christian Bale he is tremendous in this role. There are some great performances by the other nominees, but I think this is the biggest no-brainer category of this year.

I think will win: Christian Bale. Any other year, Geoffrey Rush would have won this category. He chose a bad year to have his best performance since Shine.

Leading Actress

The nominees are…

  • Annette Bening in The Kids Are All Right
  • Nicole Kidman in Rabbit Hole
  • Jennifer Lawrence in Winter’s Bone
  • Natalie Portman in Black Swan
  • Michelle Williams in Blue Valentine

I have seen 4 of the 5 nominees. I have not seen Rabbit Hole.

I want to win: Michelle Williams. I think she had the most interesting performance of the year, but the nomination was the award for her. I would also like to see Jennifer Lawrence win. She gave a pretty amazing performance for somebody who’s biggest accomplishment before this was being on The Bill Engvall Show.

I think will win: Natalie Portman. There is no denying that her performance is great.

Leading Actor

The nominees are…

  • Javier Bardem in Biutiful
  • Jeff Bridges in True Grit
  • Colin Firth in The King’s Speech
  • Jesse Eisenberg in The Social Network
  • James Franco in 127 Hours

I have seen 4 of the 5 nominees. I have not seen Biutiful.

I want to win: James Franco. Eisenberg is great. I have no clue why Jeff Bridges is even nominated. I didn’t know that mumbling was considered great acting. Franco’s was my favorite performance and he spent most of the movie trapped under a rock.

I think will win: Colin Firth. As much as I hate royalty, Firth is pretty amazing as the king with the stuttering problem. Oscars frequently go to actors portraying people with a disability. This is the only 1 of the 5 performances that involves a disability, unless Rooster Cogburn is suffering from a disability that doesn’t allow him to enunciate words properly.

Directing

The nominees are…

  • Black Swan
  • The Fighter
  • The King’s Speech
  • The Social Network
  • True Grit

I have seen all 5 nominees.

I want to win: The Social Network. David Fincher is one of my favorite directors and I felt that he was in a little bit of a slump. He hit the ball out of the park with The Social Network.

I think will win: I just can’t imagine a world where The Social Network doesn’t win this award.

Best Picture

The nominees are…

  • Black Swan
  • The Fighter
  • Inception
  • The Kids Are All Right
  • The King’s Speech
  • 127 Hours
  • The Social Network
  • Toy Story 3
  • True Grit
  • Winter’s Bone

I’ve seen all 10 nominees.

I want to win: The Social Network. It is the most complete well-rounded movie of the year. It is my favorite movie of the year and it is also the most entertaining.

I think will win: The Social Network. It is the most original movie of the year, so that works against it slightly. However, I think the Academy has done a pretty good job in the last few years getting this category right. I have full faith that they will get it right again.
That is it for my preview. Enjoy the Oscars!